Getty Images
How to evaluate the leading data fabric tools and platforms
AI has increased the importance of connecting distributed data. Data leaders should evaluate whether these data fabric vendors offer reliable access while maintaining control.
AI projects can reveal flaws in an organization's data architecture, such as disjointed access, inconsistent definitions and policies that do not follow data across systems.
A data fabric addresses these issues by coordinating integration, metadata, governance and delivery in a distributed data environment. Metadata provides context for discovering, managing and accessing data through methods, such as virtualization, replication and data movement. Because vendors offer different combinations of these capabilities, organizations typically build a data fabric from multiple tools rather than buy it as a single product. A data fabric can reduce data silos, simplify access for users and apps and facilitate data reuse across analytics, AI and operational processes. Building a working data fabric also requires capabilities for ingestion, security, data quality, transformation, ontology and semantics, often supported by cloud infrastructure.
Technologies, such as knowledge graphs, can help manage and integrate data within a data fabric by connecting business concepts, technical assets and their relationships. Lineage metadata traces how data moves and changes. Together, they provide users with more context for discovering and evaluating data.
As organizations adopt GenAI and agentic AI, they must check whether a data fabric can provide governed access to structured and unstructured data, and support retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) or agentic workflows where needed.
Access alone is not enough. AI systems also need metadata, provenance, lineage and semantics to interpret enterprise data in context. Access and usage policies can improve governance and auditability, but they cannot remove the risk of invented answers or compliance violations.
A data fabric works with, but does not replace, complementary architectural approaches and technologies. A data mesh assigns ownership of data products to business domains, while a data fabric supplies metadata, integration and governance to help those domains deliver and distribute data dependably. Data virtualization can provide access within a data fabric without copying data. Integration tools for ETL, ELT, change data capture and streaming move or connect data from source systems for use in other processes. A semantic layer preserves the definitions and relationships used to judge whether data is fitting for analytics, AI or operational use.
Data fabric capabilities to assess
There is no single capability that makes a data fabric. Data leaders should gauge how well each vendor connects integration, metadata, governance and delivery across the data estate for the organization's priority use cases, architecture and regulatory obligations.
The following capabilities provide a framework to compare the available features and identify potential shortcomings.
- Real-time processing and analytics support use cases that require fresh data, such as fraud detection, operational monitoring and personalized recommendations.
- AI and machine learning capabilities can support data quality monitoring and data discovery, and produce insights from structured and unstructured datasets.
- Scalability helps businesses handle growing data volumes, additional third-party sources and heavier workloads without excessive cost or latency.
- Data management organizes, indexes and queries large volumes of data so users and applications can access it efficiently.
- Security and privacy controls, such as encryption, identity integration and policy enforcement, safeguard sensitive data from unauthorized access.
- Metadata management and active metadata provide context needed to find assets, trace lineage, recommend actions and automate governance work.
- Data discovery and cataloging help teams and AI agents find the datasets that have been vetted for a particular use case.
- Policy and access controls can enforce governance programmatically at ingestion, access and processing.
- Lakehouse and warehouse integration can support open table formats and major engines without forcing data movement.
- Controls for AI agents can restrict the data they access and the actions they take before information is sent to LLMs or third-party cloud services.
- Natural language query and automation tools facilitate conversational data access and AI-assisted data pipeline creation.
What complicates a data fabric deployment?
Implementing a cost-effective data fabric presents several challenges. Data leaders must define their priority use cases and determine whether an offering works with their existing architecture. This requires asking the right questions of their technical staff and vendors during the decision-making process. Key challenges to consider include the following:
- Integration challenges. Incorporating data from diverse sources and platforms can be complex, particularly when dealing with varying formats or structures. Connecting cloud, legacy and SaaS systems might require significant connector development and performance fine-tuning. Organizations should determine if a data fabric will work with existing tools and whether it might pose difficulties with proprietary services.
- Skills and operating complexity. A data fabric requires significant technical expertise in integration, governance, security and platform operations, and the right resources to set up and manage the deployment. This can be a challenge for organizations with limited IT and data skill sets.
- Data security. Organizations must have a clear understanding of where policies are enforced, how credentials spread across systems and whether data will remain protected from unauthorized access and potential security threats.
- Governance. Organizations need a foundation that enforces governance and compliance through executable policies that can be managed, versioned and updated in response to new regulations.
Leading data fabric vendors and the capabilities offered
Based on vendor documentation and broader research on the enterprise data management market, the following unranked list profiles six established vendors whose products support data fabric deployments.
Some offerings provide a relatively integrated platform, while others offer a range of products that organizations must combine. The vendors do not necessarily market these products as data fabric offerings.
Denodo
Denodo's core offering is the Denodo Platform, which features cloud and express variants tuned for various use cases. The company has a long history in data virtualization tools and has developed an extensive partner and integration ecosystem since its founding in 1999. Key strengths include various deployment options, data transformation and data processing tools.
Denodo supports a variety of semantic and schema management capabilities for working with various data models, generating data catalogs, discovering and classifying data assets, managing data quality and using FinOps practices to manage costs. Recent AI and agentic progress has focused on grounding AI in governed data. This includes support for the Model Context Protocol (MCP), which allows compatible agents to discover and query live enterprise data within approved semantics and policies. It also provides access to vector databases alongside structured and unstructured datasets through a single logical layer that supports self-service delivery models and natural language queries for accessing AI-ready data. Agora, its managed cloud service, provides deployment and integration options for AWS and Microsoft Azure environments.
Denodo offers three pricing tiers -- team, high availability and business critical -- with pricing based primarily on data volume and products used. It also offers a free developer option.
IBM
IBM has a solid base of data integration, quality, master data management, governance and security tools now consolidated under the watsonx brand. It offers data fabric capabilities through several products: watsonx.data, watsonx.data intelligence and watsonx.data integration.
- Watsonx.data is an open lakehouse for analytics and AI.
- Watsonx.data integration handles data integration and includes DataStage for ETL and ELT, StreamSets for real-time ingestion and IBM Data Replication, along with data observability.
- Watsonx.data intelligence combines governance, cataloging and data quality capabilities from IBM Knowledge Catalog with lineage functionality from IBM's Manta acquisition.
The result is broad data fabric coverage for discovery, classification, lineage and policy combined with AI-assisted authoring across the stack.
IBM made several data fabric-related acquisitions in recent years, including Databand for data pipeline observability in 2022 and Manta for data lineage and StepZen for GraphQL support in 2023. It finalized the acquisition of the StreamSets and webMethods platforms from Software AG in July 2024 to further build on current tools with more dynamic and composable integration capabilities. IBM also provides tools for managing data fabric infrastructure after deployment. For example, schema drift capabilities notify data users of changes. The platform can also automatically update metadata and make changes available to all users.
IBM's portfolio of tools has grown through acquisitions and internal development. Pricing varies by product and deployment. Buyers should map their use cases to the right mix of services rather than expect one SKU to cover every requirement. IBM is a good fit for regulated, hybrid-cloud scenarios that require governance and integration through a single control plane.
Informatica
Informatica's data fabric reference architecture places the semantic layer at the top. It facilitates connections to data governance, data catalog, data orchestration and various AI, machine learning and knowledge graph integrations. The semantic layer also organizes interactions with data prep and data marketplace tools. Its Claire AI service can continuously analyze new data to populate the semantic layer automatically.
It can also use cost data optimization processes to manage the costs associated with a large data footprint efficiently. Its Intelligent Data Management Cloud ties together integration, data quality, data catalog, master data management and a marketplace through a metadata-driven approach.
Salesforce acquired the company in late 2025, and Informatica is now managed as a wholly owned subsidiary. The two are folding catalog, integration, governance, quality, metadata management and MDM into the Salesforce data foundation for agentic AI.
These are being positioned as a trusted data layer beneath Agentforce based on the premise that agents need clean, connected, and governed data to stay grounded. Salesforce said it will continue to support existing Informatica customers while connecting Informatica capabilities with its Data 360, MuleSoft, Tableau and Agentforce tooling.
Informatica uses consumption-based pricing with costs varying by service and usage.
Informatica is a good choice for organizations looking for a broad management platform built around a semantic layer to guide their data fabric journey.
Oracle
Oracle was one of the original upstarts to IBM's legacy database franchise. Oracle has an extensive portfolio of data management, integration and governance tools suited for data fabric architectures. One differentiator is its globally distributed transaction architecture that helps integrate data into a common data fabric across regions, clouds and data centers.
This helps streamline the process of distilling and processing information for operational and analytics purposes. Key data fabric-related tools include Exadata and Autonomous Database options on Oracle Database, using Raft-based replication to automate distribution and failover. Oracle GoldenGate can convert operational change into real-time events for agents to work with.
These work in concert with Oracle's integration, governance and metadata tooling to give large multinational organizations a consolidated data fabric for operational and analytics workloads.
Oracle has invested in generative and agentic AI to improve search, automate pipelines and expose data through natural language prompts. Ongoing work continues to improve knowledge graphs and self-service delivery models and broaden source coverage.
Oracle established a substantial on-premises data stack and has extended its database services across AWS, Azure and Google Cloud through a common management backbone.
Oracle is a good fit for large organizations that have multinational operations and demanding scale, data residency and availability requirements and want a coherent offering rather than one assembled from third-party integration tools. Oracle offers usage-based pricing for each tool.
Qlik
Qlik, founded in 1993, was an early pioneer in interactive visualization technology. It has since expanded to support a full data integration and data fabric stack as part of the Qlik Talend Cloud. This brings together elements of the 2023 Talend acquisition and the early 2025 Upsolver acquisition, combining broad connectivity, change data capture, pipeline automation, data quality and data cataloging capabilities.
The tooling covers ingestion and transformation, plus an open lakehouse that can be vetted using a trust score to assess data readiness for AI and agentic workflows.
Recent development has prioritized agentic features in Qlik Cloud, including Qlik Answers, a natural language interface, and a Discovery Agent that watches for anomalies.
An integrated MCP server allows agents, including third-party coding agents, to work with governed data products. Qlik has also begun pushing agentic execution into Talend pipelines with specialized agents for data products, data quality, cataloging and a data glossary. Qlik Talend Cloud uses a subscription model with plans and prices varying by tier and deployment.
Qlik is a strong fit for organizations seeking to consolidate integration, governance, and analytics on a common foundation. It's popular in financial services, healthcare, manufacturing and retail.
SAP
SAP has expanded beyond ERP software with a governed data platform that supports data fabric architectures. It built integration infrastructure to facilitate the use of data across a coherent data fabric. SAP Datasphere incorporates operational data through a strong metadata layer. It supports a rich set of metadata capabilities that can inform the semantic tier to help harmonize data across users and applications. Metadata capabilities improve use cases around data catalogs, search, lineage and compliance.
Datasphere now lives inside SAP Business Data Cloud, which combines SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP's Databricks offering and curated data products and applications to streamline enterprise AI and agentic data workflows. These can feed data products to Joule, SAP's agentic assistant.
SAP's continued investment and development are extending its reach beyond its own ecosystem. For example, Business Data Cloud supports native Databricks integration and can federate to cloud data stores and integrate with platforms, including Google BigQuery, Snowflake and Microsoft Fabric.
SAP traditionally used a top-tier pricing model, which was not ideal for smaller organizations. The company transitioned to consumption-based pricing for some data platform services. Organizations should examine integration issues closely when trying to extend their capabilities outside of the SAP ecosystem of tools and services.
SAP is a strong candidate for companies with a significant SAP footprint, particularly those trying to incorporate operational data and preserve business context for analytics, AI and agentic workflows.
George Lawton is a journalist based in London. Over the last 30 years, he has written more than 3,000 stories about computers, communications, knowledge management, business, health and other areas that interest him.