https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/governance-risk-management-and-compliance-GRC
Governance, risk and compliance (GRC) refers to an organization's strategy, or framework, for handling the interdependencies of the following three components:
The term GRC was coined in 2007 by OCEG -- formerly the Open Compliance and Ethics Group -- a nonprofit think tank. GRC emerged as a discipline in the early 21st century when companies recognized that coordinating the people, processes and technologies they used to manage governance, risk and compliance could benefit them in two ways. A synthesized approach would help ensure their organizations acted ethically. It would also help them achieve their business goals by reducing the inefficiencies, miscommunication and other perils of a siloed approach to governance, risk management and compliance.
Any size organization can use GRC. Developing a GRC discipline is especially important for large organizations that have extensive governance, risk and compliance requirements and where programs that meet these requirements often overlap.
As businesses grow increasingly complex, they need a way to effectively identify and manage key activities within the organization. They also need the ability to integrate traditionally distinct management activities into a cohesive discipline that increases the effectiveness of people, business processes, decision-making, technology, facilities and other important business elements.
GRC achieves this by breaking down the traditional barriers between business units, requiring them to work collaboratively to achieve the company's strategic goals. It aids organizations in adhering to required regulatory standards while also expanding the coverage of an increasingly large risk and threat landscape. GRC has become one of the mainstay components of today's well-managed organizations.
The three components of GRC are defined as follows:
These three activities traditionally functioned separately. In a GRC approach, each of the three components continues to interact with and support existing business functions, but the intersection of the three is where the benefits become apparent.
If properly implemented, GRC policies, practices and software can offer the following benefits:
However, if GRC isn't properly implemented or if senior management support for GRC is minimal, potential issues can emerge. Problems include high costs related to reduced risk visibility, reduced performance due to weak risk visibility and fragmentation across the organization's departments and workforce. The implementation of GRC might be complex for some inexperienced organizations, and, without proper planning, tools and processes might be poorly integrated.
GRC software implementation typically involves complex installations that include vendor negotiation and data coordination between the vendor's technical team and multiple departments in the organization, including business, IT, security, compliance and auditing.
Major challenges include integrating data and other relevant information from internal departments and external organizations into useful GRC information and providing all GRC system users with proper training to obtain maximum benefit from the software.
Changes in the corporate culture might be needed to accommodate the new GRC system's collaborative nature. Periodic testing of GRC software is essential to make sure internal departments are using it properly. Like other critical systems, GRC software must be added to technology disaster recovery (DR) plans to ensure it remains operational in a disruptive event.
The following tips can help organizations deploy GRC:
GRC software combines applications that manage GRC's core functions into a single integrated package. These tools enable an organization to pursue a systematic, organized approach to managing and implementing a GRC strategy. Instead of using siloed applications, administrators can use a single framework to monitor and enforce rules and procedures. Successful installations help with risk mitigation, reduce costs incurred by multiple installations and minimize complexity for managers.
GRC software products are available from numerous vendors. Products typically accommodate virtually any type or size of organization, including those with multiple lines of business.
Per market intelligence firm IDC and other independent resources, vendors of GRC products include the following:
GRC software can be confusing for businesses because the market is replete with many types of products, including the following:
Effective GRC software should include risk examination and risk assessment tools that identify links to business processes, internal controls and operations. GRC software identifies the processes and tools that control those risks and integrates the single, multipoint and enterprise-wide software the business currently uses.
GRC software should also provide a structured approach for compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, such as those specified in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, General Data Protection Regulation, or occupational health and safety regulations.
Other features commonly offered in GRC platforms include operational risk management, IT risk management, policy, audit management, third-party risk management, issue tracking and document management. GRC tools are increasingly cloud-based, but on-site systems and freeware options are available. GRC vendors are incorporating automation and AI technologies, including machine learning and natural language processing, to help organizations keep abreast of new and evolving risks and to make GRC tools more user-friendly.
Once in place, GRC dashboards and data analytics tools can help administrators identify an organization's risk exposure, measure progress toward quarterly goals or quickly pull together an information audit.
GRC software can, therefore, satisfy the needs of multiple stakeholders, such as the following:
When embarking on a GRC program, it's beneficial to establish a benchmark from which to plan and execute the program. A maturity model is one possible approach, as it defines the stages an organization can progress through to achieve a suitable level of GRC excellence.
The basic GRC maturity model below can be expanded and modified into greater detail as needed and serve as part of the GRC program planning process.
Stage 1 describes an organization with minimal integration of GRC: The three disciplines of GRC coexist but don't collaborate on governance, risk and compliance. As the stages progress, senior management recognizes the importance of GRC integration. Manual processes commence, and the software takes them to a higher level of cross-organization integration and automation. And, finally, by Stage 5, the organization's culture -- and, by extension, its way of doing business -- has adopted a fully integrated GRC approach.
Managing governance, risk and compliance is one of an organization's most important and complex activities. As the organization establishes a GRC program, keep the following dos and don'ts in mind.
In today's landscape, organizations must fulfill diverse regulatory compliance needs. Learn about open source GRC tools that can help compliance professionals.
13 Aug 2025