A cybersecurity framework should never be considered static or complete. Instead, think of it as a continuously unfolding set of processes that should evolve with business needs and objectives. As such, maintaining top cybersecurity frameworks requires a constant amount of care and feeding. Cybersecurity goals and objectives should be regularly reevaluated to ensure they continue to meet the needs of the business. Objectives often shift, depending on the direction the business is moving, changes to technology and the need to meet new or changing regulatory requirements.
The best way to maintain a working cybersecurity framework is to plan for how changes in processes will be handled. When shifts in business goals happen, be sure that data security goals and objectives are being consistently reviewed as well. In the event a business change requires a modification in cybersecurity policy, it is appropriate to reassess the new cybersecurity goal, create and implement a well-defined policy to meet your new goals, and be sure to document why the change was required.
Another key part of maintaining top cybersecurity frameworks properly is to monitor, track and review results against a continuously updated baseline. Never assume the processes and procedures developed to accomplish your cybersecurity goals are necessarily the best or most efficient. One should always be ready to streamline processes or use new and more advanced technologies to achieve goals. By doing so, you help to keep your cybersecurity framework fresh and operating at optimal levels.
Dig Deeper on Risk management
Related Q&A from Andrew Froehlich
CRM platforms track customer interactions, whereas SCM platforms track materials and product shipments. Tech buyers should know how these platforms ... Continue Reading
While e-commerce involves a lot of marketing and sales, it also requires IT expertise to keep platforms running. Explore seven technical skills ... Continue Reading
Zero trust and the principle of least privilege may appear to solve the same issue, but they have their differences. Read up on the two methodologies. Continue Reading