Mastering AI search optimization: Key trends and strategies

Differences between GEO and SEO

Search visibility today spans two distinct but overlapping ecosystems: generative engines and traditional search engines. While both share the common goal of surfacing relevant content, they use different methodologies and present results differently. These distinctions affect how brands should structure content, measure engagement and optimize performance.

Traditional SEO strategies are based on established signals such as page authority, structured metadata, keyword usage and technical website health. GEO is shaped by how large language models (LLMs) interpret and summarize data. It requires content to be authoritative, semantically rich and structured so that LLMs can understand and repurpose it.

Key differences between the two approaches include visibility metrics, user interaction models and optimization priorities. The table below outlines the core areas of divergence:

According to Gartner statistics, search engine volume will decrease by 25% by 2026, and more search queries will be influenced by AI-generated results. This highlights the urgency of adapting content strategies for generative engines. Visibility in these environments depends less on traditional ranking factors and more on how AI systems interpret and reuse content.

Strategies to improve brand visibility in AI-driven searches

Generative engines prioritize content that is concise, factual and highly contextual. Optimizing content for these platforms requires a different mindset than traditional SEO. While backlinks and keyword density remain relevant in SEO, GEO strategies focus on clarity, authority and trustworthiness.

To improve visibility in generative search experiences, consider the following strategies:

• Use structured, fact-based content. Generative models look for well-organized information that can be easily extracted and summarized. Bullet points, tables and clearly defined sections increase the likelihood of inclusion.
• Establish topical authority. Build clusters of related content around a single topic to reinforce subject matter expertise. AI engines prioritize sources that provide comprehensive insights over standalone articles.
• Incorporate semantic keywords. Rather than focusing solely on exact-match terms, use related keywords to give context. This helps generative systems understand content relevance.
• Reference credible sources. LLMs often replicate citation structures from training data. Linking to reputable third-party sources can improve the content's perceived credibility.
• Optimize content for conversational queries. GEO requires aligning with how users naturally ask questions. Incorporating question-based headings -- such as "What is generative search?" -- can increase the chances of being surfaced in AI-generated responses.
• Avoid fluff and filler. Generative engines prefer dense, information-rich text. Unnecessary modifiers or promotional language can reduce a source's inclusion in summarized results.
• Monitor AI engine responses. While GEO analytics are still evolving, regularly testing prompts in tools such as ChatGPT or Perplexity can help identify content gaps or opportunities for refinement.

SEO techniques that still matter

Despite the growing influence of generative search, traditional SEO remains a critical driver of discoverability. Google still accounts for nearly 90% of global search traffic, and ranking well in SERPs continues to yield high click-through rates for transactional and informational queries.

To maintain and strengthen traditional SEO performance, digital teams should continue to apply the following best practices:

• Conduct keyword research with user intent in mind. Focus on long-tail and intent-driven phrases that align with what users are searching for.
• Build authoritative backlinks. High-quality backlinks signal content credibility and remain a core part of Google's ranking algorithm.
• Improve page load speed and mobile responsiveness. Core Web Vitals continue to influence ranking positions, especially for mobile users.
• Use structured data markup. Schema.org tags help search engines understand the content and improve visibility in rich snippets and featured results.
• Create internal linking structures. Robust internal linking improves crawlability and distributes page authority across the site.
• Write compelling meta descriptions and titles. While these don't directly affect rankings, they influence user click behavior in SERPs since this content shows as the first few lines in the results list.
• Regularly audit for technical SEO issues. Broken links, crawl errors and indexing problems can undermine search performance.

Traditional SEO efforts complement GEO by ensuring foundational web visibility, creating a baseline of discoverability across both search paradigms.

GEO trends

As generative AI continues to shape user expectations and content delivery models, several trends are emerging that further define the role of GEO in digital strategy.

1. Rise of zero-click experiences. With generative engines providing complete answers directly in the interface, users are less likely to click through to websites. This makes citation-based visibility increasingly important.
2. Increased focus on trust signals. AI systems are becoming more selective in surfacing content, favoring domains with high topical authority and consistent factual accuracy.
3. Emergence of AI citation platforms. Tools such as Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews are beginning to attribute sources, enabling some level of performance tracking in generative environments.
4. Shift toward natural language queries. As users become accustomed to asking full questions, content strategies must reflect this shift to remain relevant in both GEO and SEO.
5. Content repurposing for AI channels. Organizations are developing workflows to reformat existing content for generative engines, breaking down long-form assets into answer-ready sections.
6. Blending of SEO and GEO roles. Content and SEO teams are beginning to unify their strategies, recognizing that optimizing for traditional search also lays the foundation for GEO success.

The debate between GEO and SEO is not a matter of replacement, but of evolution. While SEO remains essential for traditional search engines, GEO introduces a new dimension of discoverability driven by how AI interprets and distributes content. Organizations that align strategies across both areas will be best positioned to maintain visibility, authority and relevance across the expanding landscape of digital search.

Griffin LaFleur is a MarketingOps and RevOps professional working for Swing Education. Throughout his career, LaFleur has also worked at agencies and independently as a B2B sales and marketing consultant.