Browse Definitions :
Definition

stacked ranking (stack ranking)

What is stacked ranking (stack ranking)?

Stacked ranking (stack ranking) is an employee evaluation method that slots a certain percentage of employees into each of several levels of performance. The goal is to separate out the high-performing employees from the low-performing employees in order to reward the former and, ultimately, cultivate a high-performance workforce.

Stacked ranking is an employee performance management approach in which high-performing employees are differentiated from their low-performing colleagues based on certain metrics and a bell curve ranking system. Employees whose performance is better than their peers are considered top-tier performers and awarded higher ranks.

Low performers receive lower ranks. Employees with the lowest ranks may be laid off. This knowledge is meant to motivate all employees to do better than their colleagues so the organization can create a high-performance workforce.

The stacked ranking model of performance appraisals is also known as stack ranking, employee stack ranking, forced ranking and rank and yank. And, because the ranking is inherently somewhat arbitrary, the model is also sometimes referred to as a forced distribution.

performance ranking employees bell curve
The bell curve model of stacking employees based on performance into high performers, average performers, and low performers.

How stacked ranking works

A stacked ranking model might assume a normal distribution or bell curve. A majority of employees fall in the middle part of the bell curve with small minorities on either side. The percentage distribution of the top-middle-bottom performers can be something like 10-70-20, 10-80-10, 20-70-10, etc.

For example, the minority may represent 10% of employees who are labeled "high achievers," 80% are satisfactory and valuable, and 10% are detrimental to the company. When evaluating the staff, administrators, such as managers or human resources (HR) personnel, assign individuals to those categories in such a way that the percentages assigned to each category remain constant.

Companies have different ways of determining the next steps for the employees in each group. For instance, one company may fire the low performers, while others may place them on a performance improvement plan. Similarly, one company may promote high performers, while another may reward them with a performance bonus.

Companies that use -- or used -- stacked ranking

One of the first companies to adopt the stacked ranking model was General Electric (GE). The model was pioneered by the company and its then-CEO Jack Welch in the 1980s. It was then adopted by many other companies.

Companies that use -- or did use -- stacked ranking include Dow Chemical, Enron, Motorola, IBM, and Yahoo. Microsoft followed the stacked ranking model for years but abandoned it in 2013 in response to employee complaints about the system.

Tech giants, like Amazon and Google, have also used stacked ranking -- or a modified version of it -- to appraise employee performance and try to maintain their workforce's overall performance levels. Google used stacked ranking to determine who should be promoted, while Amazon has since abandoned the model in favor of a less contentious continuous feedback employee appraisal model.

What is an example of stacked ranking?

One of the best-known stacked ranking systems is Welch's vitality curve. Welch explained the concept in his 2001 book, Jack: Straight from the Gut.

The vitality curve is also known as the 20-70-10 system. This is because it assigns high-achieving employees, whom Welch called "A players," to the top 20%; normally productive employees (B players) to the middle 70% level; and unproductive employees (C players) to the bottom 10% rank.

According to Welch, the top employees are passionate about and committed to their work and of the greatest use to the organization. They should, therefore, be further motivated with bonuses and other rewards. On the other hand, the bottom 10% are the "nonproducers" and Welch believes that they should be fired.

The middle-of-the-path B players are not as effective or as beneficial as the A players; neither are they as expendable as the C players. However, they constitute the majority of the workforce, are vital to the organization's business continuity and success and should, therefore, be retained and encouraged to improve.

Controversy erupted around the vitality curve after it was first proposed, which explains why GE has since moved away from the practice. However, several companies still follow the model, albeit covertly to avoid criticism from customers, the public and other stakeholders.

diagram of steps of performance management
Five basic steps of performance management

Pros and cons of stacked ranking

Proponents of stacked ranking claim that it motivates midrange employees to aspire to top-level ranking by clearly highlighting their weaknesses and areas of improvement. It also helps companies to clearly identify and weed out underperformers, which enables them to create a high-performing workforce that benefits the firm. In doing so, the model can help them increase their productivity, which can then positively impact profits.

Critics of the model argue that it is too cutthroat and "me-focused" and discourages cooperation and collaboration. For the same reasons, they believe that it encourages unethical behaviors, especially among employees who aspire to join the ranks of the A players and also among employees who are already ranked A players and are desperate to remain in that group.

Another criticism of stacked ranking is that it hampers staff cohesiveness and morale since it encourages competitiveness over teamwork. It can also lead to bullying and blaming of so-called low-performers, thus creating a toxic workplace culture, instead of a culture that encourages innovation and learning through experimentation.

Yet another problem with the stacked ranking model is that it is associated with threats of probation and termination that can demotivate low-ranked employees instead of encouraging them to improve their performance. Low motivation levels among staff can affect their workplace engagement, which then adversely impacts the company's overall productivity and, eventually, its profitability and competitiveness.

A stacked ranking appraisal system also prioritizes performance at all costs over healthy habits related to mental health and work-life balance. Consequently, it creates teams who are high-performing but, at the same time, highly burned out. Overwhelmed, highly burned out employees are more likely to be absent or to quit entirely, increasing the company's turnover problems.

See how to solve the biggest employee retention challenges. Read this guide to build an effective employee experience strategy. Explore performance appraisal types for HR leaders to consider and top performance review questions and answers.

This was last updated in December 2023

Continue Reading About stacked ranking (stack ranking)

Networking
  • firewall as a service (FWaaS)

    Firewall as a service (FWaaS), also known as a cloud firewall, is a service that provides cloud-based network traffic analysis ...

  • private 5G

    Private 5G is a wireless network technology that delivers 5G cellular connectivity for private network use cases.

  • NFVi (network functions virtualization infrastructure)

    NFVi (network functions virtualization infrastructure) encompasses all of the networking hardware and software needed to support ...

Security
  • virus (computer virus)

    A computer virus is a type of malware that attaches itself to a program or file. A virus can replicate and spread across an ...

  • Certified Information Security Manager (CISM)

    Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) is an advanced certification that indicates that an individual possesses the ...

  • cryptography

    Cryptography is a method of protecting information and communications using codes, so that only those for whom the information is...

CIO
  • IT project management

    IT project management is the process of planning, organizing and delineating responsibility for the completion of an ...

  • chief financial officer (CFO)

    A chief financial officer (CFO) is the corporate title for the person responsible for managing a company's financial operations ...

  • chief strategy officer (CSO)

    A chief strategy officer (CSO) is a C-level executive charged with helping formulate, facilitate and communicate an ...

HRSoftware
  • HR automation

    Human resources automation (HR automation) is a method of using software to automate and streamline repetitive and laborious HR ...

  • compensation management

    Compensation management is the discipline and process for determining employees' appropriate pay and benefits.

  • HR technology (human resources tech)

    HR technology (human resources technology) is an umbrella term for hardware and software used to automate the human resource ...

Customer Experience
  • martech (marketing technology)

    Martech (marketing technology) refers to the integration of software tools, platforms, and applications designed to streamline ...

  • transactional marketing

    Transactional marketing is a business strategy that focuses on single, point-of-sale transactions.

  • customer profiling

    Customer profiling is the detailed and systematic process of constructing a clear portrait of a company's ideal customer by ...

Close